Lots and lots of good comments in this thread.
First my photographic journey can be chronicled right here on TWT, I have always been a picture taker, but would never have been confused for what I would call a photographer. I am able to take pictures like I do today because of the help and motivation I received here on TWT.
In early 2009, RTScott (was STScott back then) & Sharkey volunteered to teach a class in Irving. That was the first time I learned what Aperture, ISO & Shutter Speed meant in relation to each other. It was also where I learned a new way to think about picture taking. Sharkey commanded when we were wrapping up for us to “leave here and from now on quit just taking pictures and go out and create images”. I am paraphrasing but that is the just of it and it really was an eye opener for me.
The photo assignments were like a class room assignment for me, they motivated me to shoot more and then my confidence started to improve and my images started to get better. I attribute the skills I have acquired thus far (I am still learning) to the photo assignment threads.
For a while there were many of us like minded shooters who were truly challenging each other to shoot more and to shoot better with an emphasis on Composition, Exposure and Subject matter. Then there would be valuable feedback in the form of a critique after the assignment ended. I am going to be a negative nelly about it today... those days have passed.
It was never a CONTEST on who would win a prize it was an ASSIGNMENT to create an image that best conveyed the chosen subject matter to the judge for that round.
I don't want to see it go, but I am also bored with it in its current state. Fundamentally it is simply because of the lack of participation. But then I don’t participate which just perpetuates the issue. Between 60 hour weeks with my day job and balancing a healthy relationship with my wife, the assignment threads are just not as high on my To-Do lists as they used to be. What does it look like going forward? Well I hope that it will remain strongly tied to its roots and be an avenue for those trying to improve their photography skills.
I voted for choice of “Maybe but with changes – discuss”. Since brainstorming this topic, one thing to consider is how to get more picture takers involved? I am not sure just how to accomplish this but what if:
- Photos must be new works that are reflective of the assignment given. We can always go back and find inspiration or motivation from prior images but for it to be counted it should be new works taken after the start of the thread.
- A volunteer starts an assignment thread and agrees to critique the images and choose a winner. Limit the thread to 10 pictures only. It might take a day, or it might take a month, but when the thread hits 10 pics, no more entries. This will permit a single or many threads to be running concurrently without a starting date or ending date. But the thread starter has to be committed to give a critique.
- Once 10 assignments have identified their “winners”, those 10 then go into a public poll for the entire TWT family to vote on to find the “favorite”. Wash rinse and repeat, as many times as needed!
Lastly just a comment about the critiques themselves. The way I look at it, there is no way to do it wrong other than to say, Great Shoot or Meh, Bad shot. If you get the con and when it comes time for you to select the winner, put together a sentence or two of why you chose that image over your second place image, and continue. My wife works for an organization called
The First Tee, where they work with kids from 7 -17 years of age. They teach them to critique each others skills execution with a “Good-Better-How” directive. We could make this the model for the critiques. What as good, what could be better, how would you do it? Basically it promotes you must have a solution (doesn’t have to be the sole solution) to convey to their team mates, and in my mind I feel that this will help us to take better images in the end.
As Dennis Miller used to say; these are just my opinions, I could be wrong’